abstract
Gender in the Information Search Process:
An Exploratory Study of Student Experience
Prior gender research from other fields prompted this exploratory study
of the impact of gender on the information seeking experience of high school
students doing library research projects. The researcher used the cognitive,
affective, and sensorimotor framework delineated in Kuhlthau's Information
Search Process model. Kuhlthau's Process Survey and Teacher's Assessments
of Focus provided categorical quantitative data analyzed with chi square
tests. Participants kept search journals and responded to freewriting prompts
which were coded and analyzed qualitatively.
To describe both common and divergent experience of the genders, the
researcher constructed a model of nine Information Search Styles based
on level of focus (Lost, Tourists, and Navigators) and kind of involvement
(Reluctant, Detached, and Involved). These styles were related to the preferences
and abilities of the student, the requirements of the assignment or information
need, and possible differences in developmental level and epistemological
stance.
Several search styles evidenced gender tendencies. However, gender representation
was balanced in the search styles of highly successful students, those
who were detached from their topics but formulated a clear focus, Detached
Navigators, and those who were involved and also clearly focused, Involved
Navigators.
Gender related differences were found in topics, task perception, and
affective experience. Topics selected for study followed gender lines.
Males tended to emphasize information collection and to detach themselves
from their topics; females to be more reflective and to express more affect.
Kuhlthau's model was found to most accurately represent the knowledge
construction experience of those students who were clearly focused. Interest
and confidence, however, did not always increase with focus formulation,
especially for some girls, nor did less clearly focused students consistently
experience more anxiety and frustration as Kuhlthau's model predicts.
The researcher's model incorporates a diverse range of information seeking
styles reflecting students' abilities and desires to be independent information
users. It redefines success to include information exploration, involvement,
and affective state as well as the traditional success indicated by focus
formulation. The gender balanced expression of voice by the most successful
students offers the promise that both males and females have the potential
to access the power of ideas and information.
|